Stroking 
Introduction
Don't call partner names
Don't teach unless he wants you to
Teach if he wants you to
Be willing to be taught
Try not to put him under pressure
Always greet the dummy the same way
Agree to play his pet conventions
Don't let them know you have had a disaster
But let them know opponents have had one
Don't complain if team-mates have a disaster
Let them think they are playing against idiots
Dont say anything to partner
Pay no attention to their Convention Card
Always be charming
Thanks to Marc Lee for this article. It appeared in Bridge
magazine, in early 1992 I think.
Learned tomes by the score have dealt with every aspect of card play from Hugh Darwen’s hedgehogs
to how to get the best from SAQ opposite Sxx. (No, I'm not joking: how do you play AKxxx AQ AJ10
xx facing QJxxx xx Kxx AK in six spades?) Whole shelves full of secrets have been revealed by the
perpetrators of Acol, Precision and Marmic. You can even learn, in some publications, about the Pope
and David Carlisle's shirt. Ever more desperate for something new, authors delve even deeper into the
mysteries of Vinje and HUMs. Mysteries to me, anyway.
Did you ever feel that there is a gap in the available literature? Did you ever look up from your minutely
completed convention card, which partner forgets anyway, or your eighth flat one-count of the session,
and gaze fondly or in exasperation across the table? Whom did you see? Partner or your centre-hand
opponent? Why is it, when you can look up to defend against Tartans or milk the most out of your
three-spots, why will nobody help you with the most important part of your playing equipment.
Everyone else at the table.
Where did partner come from, anyway? How is it that, in this particular session, he comes to be in the
hot seat? Well:
- You always play together on a Thursday
- You always play together anyway. This is not so good because you cannot look up and work
out which day it is.
- You fixed this up weeks ago because your usual partner has:
- gone on holiday / got married / gone to prison
- defected to another team in the Gold Cup and you need practice with your new
sidekick before next Saturday.
- been relocated to Berwick-upon-Tweed.
- Partner phoned ten minutes before the start to tell you that he was sure he had told you last
week he couldn't make it but thought that he had better check, so you are playing with the
hopeful who always turns up just in case.
- You went without a partner and hoped for the best. The best, unfortunately, was fixed up
already.
Whatever his origins, clearly you would like him to play well or at least as well as he can. The approach
depends on several factors:
- your ability, which is not in doubt and is, or you think is, greater than partner’s.
- partner's opinion of your ability, which may not coincide with your own.
- partner's ability
- partner's opinion of his ability, which, again ...
if both parties agree that you are the stronger player, whether he wants to have the benefit of
your greater wisdom and better hindsight
- whether you will want to play with him again
Regardless of the answers, stroking partner in the right way will make him play better. Or less badly,
depending on your point of view.
Return to Contents
Don't call partner names
This may sound easy, but think how many times you have heard your opponents
in full cry insulting each other. After the debate about parentage has
subsided there is still half a session to go. As Terence Reese probably said,
'I would have made some comment, but I had to finish the rubber with the same
partner.'
Some years ago I played for the first time with a fairly well known player in
a minor event. On the very first board the FWKP propelled himself into a
grand slam with a trump suit of AKQ109 facing xxx. In dummy at trick one, he
triumphantly led a trump to the ten. RHO, alas, not only had the vital jack
but also wrists equal to the occasion and the laydown slam was defeated. When
I said nothing, the FWKP explained that he thought he was in six and was
taking a safety play against a five-nil break. 'Ahh,' I said, or something
similar. When nothing more was forthcoming, he said: 'Don't just sit there,
hit me or something.'
Try this at home whilst rolling about on the floor at the same time. It can't
be done. We played together after that for about four years until he got
married and retired from the game. It was Gail Moss whose Bols tip was 'Never
say anything at the table.' It works.
Return to Contents
Don't teach unless he wants you to
It should be fairly clear at the start whether you are expected to give a
free lesson. If partner is a regular one, presumably you respect his ability.
If therefore he makes a mistake, he will know and not need it pointing out.
Should he make no comment, after the next hand say something like 'Remind me
to ask you something later.' This way the opponents have no idea to what you
are referring and may think you have both missed the error.
Partner, for instance, is playing in 3NT and a simple squeeze will bring home
the bacon. However, in forgetting to cash a critical ace he transforms an
automatic squeeze into a positional one which now fails. You will be aware of
a 'tcha!', or something which is all that needs saying. Opponents, who may
well not have noticed anything amiss anyway, will be happy enough to see that
the rest of the field have apparently made it on a double finesse and a 3-3
break without your laying into him.
Return to Contents
Teach if he wants you to
Our opponents, a bright young hopeful and a lady international, had had a
less than optimum result from an unusual sequence. In his penetrating,
resonant voice, the BYH asked: 'Did you approve of my bidding on that hand?'
Eight other tables waited breathlessly for the answer.
'No.'
To be fair, this was a succinct, honest and entirely justifiable response,
but the laughter around the room must have made the BYH feel about a foot
tall. BYH's are the county players and internationals of tomorrow. If they
feel that they are loved and will get sensible answers to well-meant
questions they will arrive that much earlier.
Your partner, who you now love and cherish, may well be looking to you for
encouragement, especially if you have picked up a random beginner in earnest
search of wisdom. To answer 'Could I have made that?' with the Unlucky Expert
'No, you couldn't' may well be true but hardly what your interlocutor is
after. Nor, on the other hand, should you offer comments about the obvious
line of unblocking the ten of clubs on the opening lead after which the
clash squeeze will fall into his lap.
He may not understand.
Return to Contents
Be willing to be taught
Only casual partners do this.
Even though, as is likely, your ox has no idea what he is talking about just thank him politely for
pointing out the obvious.
- You could have made that, you know.
- Mmmm.
- The queen of diamonds was dropping.
- I know
- I always play for the queen to lie over the jack.
- I'll try to remember.
Return to Contents
Try not to put him under pressure
There are three ways of imposing time pressure on partner:
- Taking forever to play dummies when the director has been breathing
heavily down his neck twice already. Players who spend an eternity working
out how to get two tricks from A32 facing 654 do the game a great
disservice.
- Bidding out of tempo. A slow pass will either make him feel that he
cannot bid when he should, or that he is expected to when he shouldn't,
especially if he is inexperienced. And if he is not, he will prefer that his
bids appear to be made without any possible benefit from unauthorized
information.
- Defending in such a way as to make your holding apparent to everyone at
the table. You know the sort of thing. LHO leads the eight of clubs against
four spades which looks like a good enough contract. Small from dummy, and
RHO trances for a minute before contributing the six. The trump finesse loses
and LHO unerringly returns the two of clubs to his partner's ace and gets his
ruff. OK, so he might have found this without the visit to the office, but the
director is called and allegations are made. Everyone feels slightly grubby
afterwards.
So when partner leads an out-of-the-blue eight against a suit contract and you have Axxx, make your
mind up quickly.
Return to Contents
Always greet the dummy the same way
This way partner does not have to worry about what caustic comments you may
have to offer after the play is complete. Even during it, knowing some
players. This does not carry the same weight with regular partners who will
know you too well.
Some years ago the story was reported of two Italian players who were
referred to as B and G. They had the arrangement whereby if dummy was what
was expected and the contract assured (if you play dummies like an Italian,
that is) then they would say 'Thank you.' However if a wheel had come off the
reaction was 'Grazie.' After a convoluted sequence B proudly displayed his
hand, convinced that his bidding, right down to the Omega asking bids, was
perfect. G, deep in thought as to how to play the hand, absent-mindedly
muttered 'Grazie.' B leapt to his feet. 'Grazie! What do you mean, grazie!'
If world champions can do this, so can you. Don't put partner under
pressure.
Return to Contents
Agree to play his pet conventions
This applies only to pick-up partners, really. If he wants to play something
atrocious like Stayman or Blackwood, humour him. At least you understand it
and he will feel happy.
At Brighton a couple of years ago we were one short for the pivot teams, so
the desk found someone for us. After a short discussion resulting in a simple
version of weak-double-ace, she asked about discards. Mostly, we said, we
throw cards we no longer need. Dodds discards, she said firmly. OK, we
said.
To this day I have no idea what Dodds discards are and, before anyway writes,
I have no wish to know. But our friend thought we were playing them, and that
made her happy.
Sometimes you will have three other people claiming to be on your side, not
just one. If this is the case, you are playing the little-known version of
the game know as teams. There may even be four or five others. Certain
extravagant types of this variant admit to as many as eleven.
Now, in addition to having to stroke partner at the table, you face the
hazard of scoring up after each session. With seven or more team-mates, this
can happen twice, so you had better have your technique polished as it has to
pass muster twice. It will come as no surprise to learn that the rest of
the team has to be stroked as well.
Return to Contents
Don't let them know you have had a disaster
Partner passed you in a splinter and you went six off vulnerable, not
doubled. In passing you note that they have a miracle 18-point 3NT on.
The scoring goes thus:
- plus 100 (your game was going off)
- minus eleven
- how?
- well, we were hoping you might bid the awful 3NT but in view of your
disciplined style we weren't too optimistic.
Creep. And you got away with it. Team-mates are now thoroughly outraged and will take appropriate
action in the next set.
Opponents bid a shocking minor suit slam, you misdefend in a heads-or-tails situation and 1370 goes
away. 6NT is laydown.
- plus 1440
- well bid, two in.
Joey Silver of Canada has a theory that you just call out the IMPs gained
or lost, not your score on the board. The trick seems to be that you get them
to give their score first, but this is not always easy. Maybe he has a point;
look what you can get away with.
Return to Contents
But let them know opponents have had one
Recently partner opened a 12-14 no-trump, RHO doubled and I held xx AJxxx
AJxxx x and redoubled. Yes, there are such people. Taking every finesse in
sight he made eleven tricks and +2360, although accurate defence would have
held him to three. This is worth rubbing in to team-mates:
- plus 140
- and 2360, 21 in.
- What!
- Well ...
Return to Contents
Don't complain if team-mates have a disaster
They probably know. We all hate reporting plus 230 when scoring up, so don't
make an issue of it. A couple of weeks ago we were presented with plus 260
when our opposition had bid the dreadful small slam. Duplicating bad boards
is an art as yet unexplored.
There is a third party to be stroked; either your opponents or your left-hand
and right-hand partners, take your pick. Only this time we have to get the
worst out of them.
Return to Contents
Let them think they are playing against idiots
Perhaps they are. But don't miss an easy game or foul up a defence. No, make
out that you were lucky to find the only defence to beat their game.
Inadvertently end-play one of them. If you make a doubled partial, score it
out loud. 'Let's see, three times twenty, doubled is one-twenty, oh, and plus
fifty for the insult and, were we vulnerable, yes, that's, do you make it six
hundred and seventy?' One of the opponents has already scrawled something on
his card which might charitably be taken for -670.
When you are thoroughly disgruntled at the luck of beginners, do it again.
After you have doubled a contract 'on the bidding' which turns out to be
laydown, don't you just hate the post mortem which starts 'Well done partner.
And you were doubled, weren't you?'
Return to Contents
Don't say anything to partner
The first time I ever got to the second round of the Gold Cup, we drew a team
who clearly thought they had the beating of us. They were right, but that's
not the point.
We had bid an iffy game at game all. My RHO unilaterally took the phantom
which cost 2000 and 18 IMPs. His partner had no comment to make.
If your side has a catastrophe, say nothing. Opponents will either take this
as normal, in which case losing the match will take some doing, or be
suitably impressed.
We were.
Return to Contents
Pay no attention to their Convention Card
This doesn't mean ignore their no-trump ranges and such trivia as what
system they are using. No, I am referring to the minutely written, very neat
and mostly illegible cards which are intended simply to intimidate you.
But, their authors will say, we have to. The EBU requires a full and
comprehensive disclosure of our understandings. If we didn't produce this we
would be in breach of the rules. Not our fault if the space is inadequate.
Sure. But this is for the director's benefit in the event of a
misunderstanding, not for you to hack through and waste half the time
allotted.
I have a fully-completed card when I play. Sometimes I play conventions that
need a specific understanding about how to defend. But nothing cheers me more
than to see an opponent peering aghast at the meaning of three hearts and
finding some gibberish like '7-24 HCP, at least seven diamonds headed by the
AQJ and singleton jack of clubs.'
Panic. What are we going to do about this when it comes up? (Note the use
of _when_.) Who cares: it won't. And whatever they agree, if the weapon does
appear, at least one of them will have forgotten.
So just have a philosophy on the likes on Tartans, Rainbows and Alders. Then
when partner points out that they are using a Martian two spades
non-vulnerable in third, just say 'Usual rubbish, then?' They won't know
whether this refers to their system or your defence and they are not about to
ask.
They'll hate you for it.
Return to Contents
Always be charming
Stroke your opponents too. Smile a lot. It won't half put them off.
Return to Contents
University of Warwick Bridge Club - bridge@sunion.warwick.ac.uk